timp3 (Human Protein Atlas)
Structured Review

Timp3, supplied by Human Protein Atlas, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/timp3/pmc12921991-150-20-9?v=Human+Protein+Atlas
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Bioinformatic Analysis of Contrasting Expression Patterns and Molecular Interactions of TIMPs in Breast Cancer: Implications for Tumor Progression and Survival"
Article Title: Bioinformatic Analysis of Contrasting Expression Patterns and Molecular Interactions of TIMPs in Breast Cancer: Implications for Tumor Progression and Survival
Journal: Pathophysiology
doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology33010013
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression levels of TIMPs across breast cancer molecular subtypes. Violin plots showing the relative expression (Z-score) of TIMP genes across breast cancer molecular subtypes: Luminal A ( n = 499), Luminal B ( n = 197), HER2+ ( n = 78), basal (TN) ( n = 171), and normal-like ( n = 36). ( A ) TIMP1 gene expression. ( B ) TIMP2 gene expression. ( C ) TIMP3 gene expression. ( D ) TIMP4 gene expression. Data were obtained from the TCGA PanCancer Breast Invasive Carcinoma dataset via cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Gene expression values are represented as Z-scores relative to normal tissue samples. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests to compare gene expression levels across molecular subtypes relative to the Luminal A subtype. Statistical significance relative to Luminal A samples is indicated as p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), and p < 0.0001 (****).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression levels of TIMPs across breast cancer tumor stages. Analysis of TIMP1 ( A ), TIMP2 ( B ), TIMP3 ( C ), and TIMP4 ( D ) gene expression in breast tumor samples classified by tumor stage from I to IV. Values are expressed as Z-scores relative to normal tissue samples. Violin plots show the distribution and density of the data within each group. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests to compare expression levels across tumor stages relative to stage I. Statistical significance relative to stage I is indicated as p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: TIMP expression levels in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer patient samples and cell lines. Gene expression analysis of TIMP1 ( A ), TIMP2 ( B ), TIMP3 ( C ), and TIMP4 ( D ). Dataset GSE45827 shows the corresponding TIMP expression in different molecular subtypes of breast tumor samples. Dataset GSE4813 shows TIMP expression in cell lines classified into different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s tests to compare expression levels across tumor stages. Statistical significance is indicated as p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***). The frequency of breast cancer and normal samples showing TIMP1 and TIMP2 protein expression, negative (N), low (L), medium (M), and high (H), are represented in sections ( E , F ). Sections ( G , H ) show representative images of TIMP1 and TIMP2 in breast cancer and normal samples, respectively.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression levels of TIMPs and their correlation with overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients. Red lines represent low TIMP expression, and blue lines represent high TIMP expression. The Y-axis represents the probability of survival, and the X-axis represents patient follow-up time. A representative p -value is shown in each graph. Univariate Cox regression models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ( A ) Correlation between TIMP1 expression and OS; ( B ) correlation between TIMP2 expression and OS; ( C ) correlation between TIMP3 expression and OS; and ( D ) correlation between TIMP4 expression and OS.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Positive correlation of TIMP3 with KEGG signaling pathways and GO enrichment in breast cancer. KEGG and GO analysis ( https://bio.tools/david_bioinformatics_resources , accessed on 11 November 2025). Categorization into Biological Processes (BPs), Cellular Components (CCs), Molecular Functions (MFs), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Data were organized and are presented as bubble plots. Only data with statistical significance ( p < 0.05) were included.
Techniques Used: Protein-Protein interactions
Figure Legend Snippet: Association between TIMP expression and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer. ( A ) Heatmap showing Spearman correlation coefficients between the expression levels of TIMP1 , TIMP2 , TIMP3 , and TIMP4 and the estimated infiltration fractions of major immune and stromal cell populations, as inferred by the EPIC algorithm using the TCGA PanCancer Breast Invasive Carcinoma dataset via cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics RNA-seq data. Color intensity represents the direction and magnitude of the correlation (red, positive; blue, negative). Statistical significance is indicated as p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). ( B – E ) Violin plots comparing immune and stromal cell infiltration levels between high- and low-expression groups for TIMP1 ( B ), TIMP2 ( C ), TIMP3 ( D ), |and TIMP4 ( E ). Patients were stratified based on the median expression value of each TIMP. Estimated cell fractions are shown for B cells, CAFs, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, NK cells, and other cells. Statistical differences between groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Significance levels are indicated as p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), and p < 0.0001 (****).
Techniques Used: Expressing, RNA Sequencing

